Reading Lolita On Paper
June 3rd, 2010

I just finished reading Lolita; it was my first time reading it, but it was not my first Nabokov novel (having already enjoyed Pale Fire and Ada or Ardor). It was a 1955 American hardback edition, the first year Americans got their hands on the book. I don’t understand why anyone buys new classic books in any format — paperback, hardback, or ebook — when beautiful and historic hardback copies can be easily purchased online for a fraction of the cost of buying a new copy.
Nabokov is a staggeringly good writer, in both style and substance. Every sentence feels like a gift from the author to the reader. In the delivery of a gut-wrenching and thrilling plot, he draws you in, deeper and deeper, with his beautiful and astonishing use of language and dramatic structure. I flew through the final 100 pages of Lolita on a flight back from Amsterdam, and it must have been amusing, or perhaps disconcerting, to my fellow passengers to see my face, enrapt, my expressions shifting repeatedly from intense concentration, to a state of near-tears, to knowing giggles, repeat, repeat, in a determined sprint to the conclusion.
(It may strike you as crass for me to consider running a race a suitable metaphor for reading a great book, but please understand that for me, as an athlete, finishing a race is not the end of an ordeal but a supreme pleasure.)
And what delight as, finishing the third to last, right-side-facing page, I turned to the final spread, one-and-one-half pages of text, and unexpectedly found some of the most heartbreaking words of the whole novel, right at the top of the penultimate page, the finish line within sight: an experience that was both textual and physical in its manifestation. Was it the author, the typesetter, both, or neither, who constructed — designed — this neat, sublime, perfectly-timed emotional jolt?
Throughout the final terrifying third act of the book, Nabokov knew that the reader would be constantly, sometimes consciously, sometimes not, seeking (or deliberately avoiding seeking) a single word, a word whose distinctive typographical form would light up like a flare in the reader’s peripheral vision, paragraphs in advance, impossible to miss. Every time you turn a page, even if you avoid it, your eyes will, in an instant, claw through the one-thousand characters in every new two-page spread to find it, the word, the single characteristic letter. He plays with this visual expectation so thoroughly — torments the reader, in fact — that it’s inconceivable that he wasn’t always thinking about printed words, words on pages being turned in a reader’s hands.
Oh, how glad am I that I was unable to find Lolita in any sort of eBook format.

would love to hear your thoughts on Ada as well. I read Pale Fire in college when we being so pomo, and liked it quite a lot, and then in my 20s went on a total Nabokov jag and read everything I could get my hands on, ultimately reading interviews and essay collections.
Intimidating for a would-be writer, but at the same time deeply inspiring and uplifting.
To me, Ada is probably his masterwork.
by xian June 3rd, 2010 | 4:29 pmBefore you get too excited, JD Salinger actually wrote the book Lolita…. it is, however a staggering book as mentioned. Having grown up in the theatre, a highly over-sexualized environment regardless of age, Lolita spells out and personifies the relation between overtly emotionally mature but underage feminine wiles and the desperate lonely longing of a mature male for her companionship. Always a fan of Kubrick, I wish he were able to elaborate more on L and HH’s road travels.
by carlyErin O'Neil June 11th, 2010 | 11:18 pmOne cannot read a single paragraph of Lolita and think it was written by J.D. Salinger, no matter how great you think Salinger might be, or how much you disregard reality itself. The writing speaks for itself, and the quality isn’t even comparable. I’m not going to let some half-baked hoaxy theory from the Village Voice, God love ‘em, stand up here without rebuttal. I do, however, share your love for this book.
by Christopher Fahey June 12th, 2010 | 12:37 amI’m glad I found this post. The graphical reading is excellent!
I agree about Nabokov’s style; I don’t see how the past century could have produced 2 Nabokovs. If Salinger wrote “Lolita”, you have to figure he just secretly WAS Nabokov, an even spicier scenario.
Actually Salinger was just Salinger; but for what it’s worth I’ve long thought of Holden as oddly connected to Humbert. He is a kind of weak & ragged proto-Humbert who lacks the spectacular linguistic energy, I think.
by Tom Jameson June 24th, 2010 | 5:23 amI’ve always considered Lolita the greatest of Great American Novels.
by Tim F. August 30th, 2010 | 10:58 pmTwitter had a tweet on using promotional stadium cups, and lead me here.
by Yuonne Fullerton July 7th, 2011 | 12:52 am